I had seen this musical comedy on stage and almost gave birth whilst watching as the sound was so loud. I remember thinking the plot was quite superficial and the songs, well, I was a teenager during the Abba’s years, so I had enough. My mother-in-law wanted to watch the movie and dutifully I proposed to come with my youngest son ( he’s almost 11). Surprise! We all liked it! The scenery makes you dream- it puts you in holiday automatic pilot mode. Although most of the male cast were a tad rigid and definitely not the best singers, it gave a touch of reality and tenderness to the whole thing. Mery Streep – whom I would never had seen as a hippy- was so right that you sympathize all along with her character. Her daughter on screen- played by Amanda Seyfried- was just beautiful. She stole the screen at every appearance and made a very unlikely story believeable ( at least for 2 hours). We came out relaxed and joyful. My son loved the songs. Poor me. Another summer listening to Abba. What wouldn’t we do for love…
If you need to de stress, go and see Mamma mia!.
“Wanted” with James McAvoy and Angeline Jolie
Another action movie I thought. The kind where everything is surreal – think the after Matrix- and violent. Angelina Jolie and her overdone pout are not a plus as I am a woman and don’t need a blow job. McAvoy though is an entire other dish though. Not that I fancy him whatsoever, but I consider him one of the best actors of his generation. I am convinced that he could sell nappies to a bachelor if he wanted to and turn any scenario into a goldmine despite the director and the script – and I have a tendency to think that the director make the actors in general.( I came up to this conclusion after seeing Tom Cruise in ” Magnolia” by the way. Tom Cruise for me is the epithome of action heroes actors,fast but incapable of conveying anything less than a canvas face – a blank face – which is supposed to let the spectator imagined any emotion applicable to the situation described ( ” Your mother had died” becomes a stare of despair or hope depending on what YOU feel but if you look closely the actor’s eyes it could also means ” When is the next pause, I need a wee/a fag/ a shag/ to get out of here”.Sorry for the disgression).
Ok so the story is about the son of an assassin who becomes involved in a fraternity of assasins in order to restablish some kind of order by bringing down a villain. The hero is supposed to have his father’s pool gene and in consequence is submitted to a regime of humiliations and routines so he can replace his father – the latest has been killed by the villain-and finish his task while helping the fraternity. Ahoy, that’s a scenario. Of course there is a twist you great neenee and the final scene has probably to do something with alost part of Matrix somewhere ( never forget that a killer, even a good one, can’t always completely win. No way. This is Hollywood talking).
Morgan Freeman is as best bored, Angelina Jolie is doing her Lara Croft routine without blinking and James McAvoy gives you the most unbelievable performance of the most pathetic killer ever seen – and he is better than wonderful. Just for him, and Mr McAvoy I salute you, the movie is worth seeing, watching, buying. I hope James McAvoy continues his way to stardom and remains what he truly is at heart- a great actor. Hats off.
I hated the scenario of course. It is one of these guys thing where being tough and tougher is of course best, and they actually are plain stupid. Even James Bond looks like a grown up compared to this.
“Hancock” with Will Smith and Charlize Theron.
Will Smith in a comedy, playing a Superhero gone awry and possibly alcoholic, I couldn’t missed that one. For the ones who know me – and the ones who don’t- I love Will Smith. His performance is okay but the roles he chooses are just genius. He gives you a story, he delivers a performance, he makes cinema interesting. I am all for it and I don’t even check what the story is about, I go and see it. A bit the same with John Travolta and John Cusack by the way.
So Will Smith is Hancock and not doing the best of it. Comes in an idealist whom he saved, and redemption is down the road. Then right in the middle of the movie, once you suddenly realized ” So what? How far can we go with this?” , you are embark on an entire new scenario that is completely separated from the first part. You just go:” What the heck….?” and you don’t have to think it over until the end. The twist is clever although the ending was a tad over the top for me. You can see that the credit crunch is already biting- people need sweet and hopeful endings. So that’s what you get.
The kids loved it.
“Penelope” with Christina Ricci and James McAvoy
A lovely fairytale for girls of every age who wants to find a prince charming and please to her parents at the same time. If you are the girl in question and you have some act of independency to perform , go and see this WITH your parents.
Christina Ricci is cute, McAvoy is cute, Reese Witherspoon is under employed and the good ones win. Happy ending, it is afairy tale I telling you.
Strangely my eleven years old son liked it. So maybe it is not only for girls.
“The other Boleyn girl” with Nathalie Portman and Scarlett Johansson
We all have heard about this one. Two lovely girls ( tongues out gentlemen please) AND Eric Bana. Guys and gals are salivating. History is happily revised, the story of ambition and love of two sisters who are living opposite in the midst of their dirty family plans is quite a program for a movie. Quite cleverly done ( you don’t need a PHD to follow the plot suttleties), you can still see that strong women have to submit to their males counterparts otherwise they have to be ready to pay the heavy consequences ( in these days, it was your head off. Nowadays, a guy who is half as qualified as you are is paid double). Neither portman nor Johansson are entirely convincing in their roles and for some reason I believe that if the director had been a tad more perverse he could have achieved a masterpiece had he inverted the roles of the leading ladies, but hey, it is not my job after all.<br />
Eric Bana is good. I liked him a lot in ” Munich”- a movie that deserves better and is worth watching. It is quite nice to see English people acting as low as Machiavel – although they don’t seem too good at it. I’d give this a five out of ten. At least Keira Knightley was not in it.
“The woods” by Harlan Coben
I like Mr Coben ‘s style. His books are page turners and you can’t put them down before you’ve known the end. Result- I usually start them at 10pm, keep reading until 1am then can’t sleep until I have finished it all- typically you can add two more hours of reading. This said I don’t like his Myron Bolivar’s stories and don’t bother buying them anymore. For the ones who speak French ( I believe he hasn’t been translated into English so far) and who will know what I talk about he gives me some reminiscence of another writer called Paul -Loup Sulitzer. And Sulitzer goes on my nerves easily – except for one of his books called ” Cartel”- his masterpiece in my humble opinion.
Anyway- back to Coben last novel. This one is about – once again- a guy who’s being caught up by his past, his lies and his personal tragedies. Nobody around him seems to be immune to the rules of ” we can’t be all black or white or good or bad”, which of course creates an entanglement of deceptions and redemption. Sadly Coben has a tendency to come back to one last twist- it is almost becoming a ritual- of threatening at the very last moment the hero’s last support. It is a tad annoying and not very original but in this last opus, it fits the bill perfectly. You see the long term practice – every detail has its importance- and you end up satisfied. The only thing that marvels me is that except for ” Tell no one” I don’t thin k any of his best sellers has been put on the big screen- but I am confident that this situation will soon be corrected.
Go, Coben, go!
Planet earth
Although this is not a movie but a serie of documentaries on animals and habitat of our lovely planet, these dvds definitely deserve a review. Their quality and their purpose is a must see for the whole family. I am not so much an animal person anymore. I used to love cats, dogs, guinea pigs, mice and hamsters when I was a child. I was desperate to have an animal – but except for a hamster, didn’t have much luck. The hamster lasted 2 years and I was quite upset when he died. I inheritated 3 gold fish when I was a teenager. two of them died jumping out of the aquarium – landing on my pillow and the last one had the position of a hanging man the very last time I saw him. I tried to save a pigeon who had a broken wing and had to bury him in a park nearby- a friend of my mother helped me. As soon as I lived on my own I got a cat. He was actually my boyfriend’s family cat. His parents had decided to move back to America and had the intention to have him put to sleep. I was horrified and I adopted him. He was white and yellow with angora hair – no pure race there. I loved him to bits and since he left, more than twenty years ago now, I kept adopting yellow cats. I am without one currently, as the last one died this year – he was run over by a car. But I miss having a cat – and it is in my plans to have another one by the spring.
This said, I find animals interesting and I enjoy watching monkeys at the zoo when I bring my kids along. I am terrified by lions and bears, or tigers, or any wild cats for that matter, but I appreciate that there are more than one living form on earth. Of course I have my doubts about this last statement when I look at my fellows human, but you know what I mean.
I knew naturally that animals in the wild are predators mostly and that it is not always pretty or fair. I had once watched a documentary on lions where the father waited for the mother to go hunting and just killed his own children that he ate with delight. One of my sons was with me at the time – he was 4. Neither him or me fully recovered after this- we both don’t like lions very much anymore. But I never really truly understood what it meant to live in the wild. The truth is simple- and it is ugly. At the same time, there is something magical and incredibly hopeful about the destiny of thousands of defferent species. Imagine: all they do is look for food and look for water. They have to travel for days or weeks to have a few days of abundance that will give them enough strength to carry on for the rest of the season(s). Their fight for survival is amazing. They follow path that no one who is slightly sane would follow but they still make it. They have to sleep and walk and eat in incredible condition. And they have no choice about it. It made me terribly sad to see the victims try to run and succumb anyway. It was fascinating to see that the first bite was all that it took to make them lose the game and accept their death without even a hint of struggle. It was scary to watch a polar bear lay down and die when food was just meters away – but he didn’t have the strength to get up for it. I am not even talking about the climate changes and the human imput to add to their misery. The whole thing is being film in the best possible conditions in images that make you dream. The earth is a beautiful place but life is hell.
So for all the commuters would get into trance as soon as they step on a bus/tube/train, for all the people who have the feeling that what they do doesn’t matter, for all the children who take Father Xmas ‘ toys for granted, for all of us who believe that we deserve more than we do….Watch this. Watch and learn.
“The book of the five rings” by Miyamoto Musashi
Mu husband offered me this book. There is a wide spread belief that traders and warriors ( or samurais or martial arts experts) have something in common. I received last year as a Xmas present some dvds ( by Clifford Bennett I think – not sure) where he displayed his skills to show how much discipline and self control are neccessary ( by actually cutting a fruit on his son’s throat with an extremely sharp Samurai sword). The aim was to show that fear has to be conquered, that practice was paramount and that execution had to be precise and flawless. I was not impressed. I still don’t understand why you should risk cutting your son’s throat to show how tough you are. At the end of the day, he would be the one who’d pay the price. Where is the metaphor for the trader’s responsability in all this?
Anyway, back to The five Rings. Written in 1643 it is still in use today for its potent metaphors. I enjoyed certain passages, such as: “The large scale is easy to see; the small scale is hard to see. To be specific, it is impossible to reverse the direction of a large group of people all at once, while the small scale is hard to know because in the case of an individual there is just one will involved and changes can be made quickly. This should be given careful consideration.” Anyone who has been against the trend knows what this means. Also any trader who’s misinterpreted a big market mover’s move gets it. Or : ” ” If you do not pursue a genuine path to its consummation, then a little bit of crookedness in the mind will later turn into a major warp.” Stick to the strategy? Rings a bell?
The main rules are the following:
1.Think of what is right and true.
2. Practice and cultivate the science.
3. Become acquainted with the arts.
4. Know the principles of the crafts.
5. Understand the harm and benefits in everything.
6. Learn to see everything accurately.
7. Become aware of what is not obvious.
8. Be careful even in small matters.
9. Do not do anything useless.
Isn’t this just a perfect way to display the cardinal rules in trading? any points forgotten and you’re dead meat. A last one for the road: ” ” If you think of catching, think of hitting, think of blocking, think of tying up, ot think of obstructing, you will thereby become unable to make the kill. It is crucial to think of everything as an opportunity to kill.” Do you remember Nike’s motto : ” Just do it” ? Now you can add the final touch, the one that has been written more than 350 years ago: focus.
Now, if you were to read this book and is able to explain – making sense- how to apply ” The body of the short-armed monkey” or ” The sticky body” to something else than street combat, please let me know, I shall be interested.
I have high hopes that somebody will buy me as a Xmas present ” the art of War”, if possible in French. I promise to make the review of it…
“Autobiography” by Agatha Christie
I have no shame whatsoever to reveal that I am a fan of Agatha Christie. I read almost all of her books ( there are more than 80 of them) – and I actually did this twice ( the first time when I was 11 and the second when I was 29. I am planning to re read the entire collection as soon as I can find the books in my still packed boxes).
Mrs Christie was a phenomenon. Her autobiography – that was written in 15 years , from the 50’s to the mid 60’s- tell us of her memories from the beginning until she reached middle age. Optimistic, full of good sense and practical advice, very detailed about the ways of two extincted eras ( the pre-1 st war and the second), the book is an easy read and although it has almost a thousand pages, you end up wishing she had written more. A life was not so extraordinary – or so she wants you to believe.
I realized that she must have been a master in disguising aher true feelings. She obviously believed in discretion and good manners and was by no means a kiss and tell sort of person- or at least not outside her intimate entourage. The book tells you nothing of her much publicized vanishing in 1926 and the only reference she made about it in her book was to say how the media could be hurtful when they smell a scandal. Silence is also made upon the infidelities of her second husband although she stretches at the end of her confessions that she has reached a stage in life where the things of the heart are behind her and the little pleasures of life sufficient to her happiness. How much of this is true, I don’t know. I just hope that I am right not to feel too sorry for her.
If you are curious about the habits and customs of the early 20th century I do recommend reading it. Life seems to have been peaceful then and quite easy. I strongly suspect that it is not reflecting the reality but it is quite interesting to read.
“Death at a funeral”
The title of this movie made me think that someone was trying to be subtle here – but it was bit obvious to me. Nevertheless I decided to drag my poor husband to go and see it ( I was not tempted by ” Beowulf” or ” The Dark is rising”…). I had a few doubts though as I had read that the plot was about a funeral among stiff uper class society turned funny because an unknown dwarf turns up and declares that he is the deceased’s lover. You couldn’t hope for something worse.
So I was extremely surprised to be taken from the beginning. The actors were playing stereotypes to start with but once we had establish what we had ( the lawyer, the doctor, the vicar, the two sons who have issues and so on ( I am not telling it all as I wouldn’t like to spoil the surprise), the whole thing took off. And the worst it got the funnier it was. The characters suddenly were not all that they seemed and we even ended up finding them less pathetic- if not sympathetic. The dwarf is actaully almost anecdotal although of course he is the catalyst for most of the action.
This is definitely English comedy at its best. discreet, displaying vulgarity only when necessary and happily excentric.
If you have liked ” Four weddings and a funeral” but would happily skip the soppy romance part, this is for you. Men can survive during this one without feeling that their brain has been half amputated.